Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Personalized Koozies Sayings
http://www.europapress.es/catalunya/noticia-lhospitalet-badalona-pediran-denegar-arraigo-inmigrantes-incivicos- government-20101221041330.html
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Pokemon Soul Silver Freezing Patch Usa
Monday, December 13, 2010
Year End Church Donation Letter Samples
INFORMATION NOTE
Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" ALLEGED with names
Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" presented Registration Hall 325 individual claims against the "Bylaw for the Promotion of Coexistence" .
Speaking at the Full Council of 4 November Councilmember Concha Arribas justified the need for this rule showing more than 300 citizen complaints of various kinds. Thinned plot, when the Platform Cívicxs against the ordinance "has collected ten days in a 325 individual supports the arguments against this standard. self-deceit, sell this ordinance as a singular and convincing that his alleged idiosyncratic demand emanates from social logroñeses. The fallacy is revealed when checking similarities with the ordinances Barcelona, \u200b\u200bGranada, Seville, Lugo, Oviedo, Pamplona ... that seem to come as standard.
Platform "Cívicxs against the ordinance" has opted for individual presentation of claims, among other reasons, to show the absurdity of the charge of the Councillor against its members to hide behind Platforms anonymous.
support collection was launched at a ceremony which took place on November 27 in Market Square. That day was no room for denouncing injustices, exhibition of posters, role playing, bike repair shop, games, chat in the company of sweet wine ... For precisely this platform considers that this ordinance puts a halt, despite its paradoxical and interested nickname is the coexistence and social participation in a public space.
In these days when the government officially presumed guarantors of fundamental rights, in practice, wrap engender friendly legal tools that seriously violated de facto.
seempretend invisible to people deprived of these rights, people on the street, jobless, survivors begging or selling scarves, involuntary actors that portray the contradictions of capitalism. Faced with these increasingly obvious, the alternative becomes the stigmatization and criminalization of these groups. And square the circle, the ability to censor criticism and denunciation of social and political groups putting tripping and obstructing fundamental freedoms such as expression , meeting or demonstration.
The deadline for filing claims expired. For the Platform Cívicxs against Ordinance " this stage has been used to help inform and generate debate among the citizens. Opens a new phase with a number of fronts in continue walking towards a model of responsible citizenship, creative, critical and transformative.
TEXT OF CLAIMS
LOGROÑO THE CITY COUNCIL OF
D_______________________________ with ID No. _______________________________, and address for service in Logrono, ______________________________, street to the City Council to appear and make an appropriate SAYS:
That legal formula within CLAIMS Bylaw on the promotion of peaceful coexistence, whose initial approval was published in the Journal Officiel de La Rioja as of November 4, 2010 based on the following:
CLAIMS
FIRST .- Understands the respondent that this ordinance does not contribute to improve the living but also deepens the lack of communication and intolerance among the citizens, far from creating public spaces in the city as a place of coexistence and intercultural exchange, is limitation of rights and restrictions on the coexistence of citizens.
SECOND .- it believes that Reference ordinance severely limits constitutional rights, which is freedom of expression and of assembly and demonstration, which according to the provisions of our Constitution are rights that can be regulated only by the Organic Law, which of course is outside the jurisdiction of the City Council Logroño. Respondent understands that the failure to require prior authorization for information tables, putting up posters in places even if it is enabled to effect clearly limits the rights set out, represents a serious limitation of the rights included among the items being given the highest protection , warranty and coverage.
THIRD .- That the ordinance is discriminatory in terms of traffic regulation, since if it provides any inconvenience that may be caused by improper use of bicycles and not much more that can result from misuse motor vehicles.
FOURTH .- addition, the ordinance which is deficient away in terms of legal technique every time, who can not be defined without violating the principle of legal certainty which are the activities related to begging that may be disrupting the living, the mere reference to the insistence is a inadmissible vague legal concept in the field of tort law. Also attacked mercilessly in this emergency situation to the most disadvantaged social and more affected by the financial and banking crisis.
And above
REQUESTS that are addressed and appropriate to amend the ordinance in the direction indicated.
Logrono to November 23, 2010.
Friday, December 10, 2010
Movies El Cajon Westfield Mall
http://www.larioja.com/v/20101207/opinion/ordenanza-civica-igual-para-20101207.html
Monday, December 6, 2010
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Friday, December 3, 2010
How Long Do You Take Leviquin
Immersed in the global climate cuts of rights and freedoms under the pretext of security and order, covered in a purported class citizens, calling themselves "ordinance to promote coexistence" dangerously equates the punishment of hooliganism with restrictions on speech in public space Various social groups and movements, minority power uncomfortable or unhappy with the official morality. Beyond
a statement of intent, which cause such ordinances is the submission of individual social responsibility and its delegation in a Big Brother police discretion which we are forced to rely on. Rather than creating cohabitation, imposing sanctioned to, what they get is loaded. How?
Opening door to the criminalization of unruly groups for the official single thought, restriction of innovative or creative uses (urban cyclists, skaters, street art, street games, free speech), criminalizing poverty and marginalization, each more present and cumbersome in view of society that causes biempensante (begging, street work ...) and jeopardizing the spontaneity and communication to society of social movements themselves, especially those less amenable to power, it all depends on the required authorization (Or alternatively, penalty) Municipal its presence in the street.
By equating education with sanction threat, rehabilitation works for the benefit of it is unclear what private or public bodies which are sure to replace jobs, legal uncertainty and arbitrariness in its application to police the ordinance which brought about this cause more problems than he claims to want to solve.
Beyond the strictly legal, which would be the subject of another debate (not without controversy, as is being demonstrated from within the University of La Rioja) test this ordinance to existing regulations sobrenormativizar orientation populist, it is conceivable that the search of the vote of fear in a close election outcome uncertain. As is well explained by the very text of the ordinance:
"(...) This ordinance is not intended to be the solution to such behavior, but response to public concern at this phenomenon."
Citing the protection of public goods, there is however way for the degradation of public space through the truly antisocial mechanisms neoliberal privatization and speculation, while the contrary is increasingly difficult ownership of real public space (all to all) by citizenship.
A valuable public space that goes far beyond the beautification of urban furniture, modesty, decorum, normal, common sense or decency, as they appear monopolized, innuendo and vague in this Ordinance does not seek securitization but impose a conservative moral of official power, with a clear vocation for social control. Create
living it, generates good public space security. On the contrary, security enforced does not necessarily good public space. This is the familiar image of a strong hand to appease the fear in times of crisis. Scourge of "vagrancy", to which this ordinance reminds suspiciously taking us back to times we thought we overcome long ago. History repeats itself and shows us again and again how in times of systemic crisis appear populist authoritarian practices of this Ordinance is only a sample.
http://servicios.larioja.com/tu-noticia/tu_noticia_ver/Ordenanza-% 28in% 29Civica/41364/1.htm
Friday, November 26, 2010
Creamy Diarrhea In Toddlers
"Now would be a municipal police who, with his record or official report, find whether a behavior has changed the life of society "
knew that Recently, the law suffered certain disorders of behavior, which extended its tentacles cautious but relentless, shy at times, so many spiteful and biased. We knew that the charge is spread under criteria that are somewhat uncertain, and even invading grazing areas outside. We knew that the law could not stay mad at her ideal for long and we knew that the right must reinvent itself in a hypercomplex world in which it is increasingly labyrinthine apply those classical liberal principles (liberty, equality and so on), tossed in the middle of confused and entangled realities: genetics, computing, innovation, communications, technology, migration, global economies ... The world is becoming more complex, more incomprehensible, more difficult to be told. Already knew. We also knew that in this dynamic, but often guided by shadowy interests, the right would have to reproduce exponentially in response to many new situations. or maybe not. Maybe not legal because the new device is now fashionable in the city. Civility ordinance, as presented in an early television ad, to tackle once and for all those glitches hedge the rule of law so much bother. Because naive liberal legal projection was originally thought to be one of those modern metanarratives able to contain everything from certain "self-evident truths." Was evident that could not be so, so that the right should extend to areas and unexpected situations, each time adjusting to the demands of a changing reality. Until now. civic ordinances reverse this trend and are proposed as a new type of legal narrative does not fail, because not even try, to try to represent reality with pointillism and parsimony, and civic ordinance is not is report from the reality, but, above all, the pre-formed, reducing the complexity of "peaceful coexistence" with a coral tragicomedy berlanguiana beggars, bicycle, pet owners, paste-posters, street vendors and other potential infringer arbitrary configurations . All the jail!. For while the law has developed from an original constitutional provision, under judicious jurisprudential and doctrinal requirements that required adjustment with the social-and-no small opacities, now breaks civic ordinance as a method Conversely, as a way of reducing the complexity displayed in the previous law as way to return to performative statements, constituents, who, taking off from previous ideas, tell the untold metropolitan reality in just a few dozen articles. Nothing less. Legal Technology novel that, through grotesque competence ratings (must be attentive to the resources and discrediting that occurring at this legal device), more uncertainty implies that these other populist draft is intended to resolve: And is that now be a policeman who, with his record or official report, find whether a behavior has changed the life of society, has caused discomfort or have been disrespectful because people (which, incidentally, is an issue for the police). Many parliamentary debates, legislation, regulatory developments and legal disputes would have saved the world if civic ordinances had been invented two hundred years ago! Because the liberal modern law has basically consisted in searching what behaviors should be censured in a general framework of freedoms. And it is insisted the diatribes of legislators, judges, lawyers, prosecutors and academics. It was clear contexts that give meaning to the factual circumstances, to restore scope and interest, to avoid split hairs with thick strokes. It was ultimately to avoid taxes and aristocracies. But it seems that the old man has arrived right on time. Basically because this type of legal technique forwards the complexity of living together "in that sentence to be social burden on humans-a finding of immediate bureaucratic" hassle "or as" uncivil "(just as is found a traffic violation), and collect some legal literature already present in other ordinances, laws and codes, such as giving the rules package. And in a world of appearances, packing orders. And if the city promises a clean, quiet and idyllic-as an ad- mortgage is right and what it takes. Bad Times for legal rigor. Good for those who no longer need. http://www.larioja.com/v/20101126/opinion/malos-tiempos-para-rigor-20101126.html
Is The Bmw Gina Available For Purchase
The Court Supreme said Ordinance according to law Pedestrian Circulation Cyclists from Sevilla and allowing bicycles and pedestrian travel on closer, considering the appeal against the decision of the Consistory of TSJA which overturned several items related to it.
The Fourth Section of the Division of Administrative Litigation of the TS has annulled the sentence end 2008 of the Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Andalusia (TSJA), which partially upheld the appeal of a company and declared void four complete articles of the ordinance, part of two and paragraph of the annex that defines the pathways for cyclists signalized pedestrian areas.
To do this, understand that the provisions invalidated by the TSJA not violate the Traffic Act or the Rules of the road.
TSJA annulled
The articles and the Annex on "signposted cycle routes in pedestrian areas "to let riders," always respecting the priority "of pedestrian travel on pedestrian zones and transit areas shared" between them and bikes; circular counterclockwise exceptionally, and that may tie them to trees or street furniture elements.In the latter case, the Seville city ordinance permits when there is no specific parking for bicycles at a radius of 50 meters or all seats are occupied, and "provided that this does not endanger the health of the tree, not preventing it is visible "or" obstruct vehicular traffic or pedestrians. "
Given the grounds of appeal which alleged the City Council concerning the characteristics of local ordinances with respect to the other rules of a regulatory nature, and their powers and local autonomy recognized concerning traffic management, the TS shares the view expressed at the failure TSJA that municipal competition depends on the Traffic Act and its regulations.
However, to cancel several articles of the ordinance and part of its annex on "signposted cycle routes in pedestrian zones" on the grounds that they "contradict" the definition of pedestrian area which includes the law, the Supreme Court argues that the sentence TSJA of the premise for "erroneous."
Thus, the TS says that "this provision" adopted "in response to the changes that have occurred in the city in terms of mobility with the implementation of bicycle lanes" and "had the intended to prevent possible tensions that may arise between users of the bike lanes and pedestrians, thus delimiting the rights and obligations of both. "
Considers that, in this way," the narrow lateral space or part of the sidewalks that were previously the exclusive use of pedestrians, so they can travel on a new bicycle corridor is not violated with this definition the pedestrian area.
The Supreme Court added that "although (the pedestrian) may be a bit small, mode any means they must share the passage of pedestrians and cyclists, and that this is set out in Articles canceled a specific area for the bicycle lane, which therefore necessarily longer pedestrian.
Charging 37v Lithium Polymer Battery
Click on the link to listen to the audio:
Monday, November 22, 2010
Dragonball Bulma Episodes
Act for the promotion and vindication of public space as a place of coexistence and citizen participation . Saturday 27 17h-22h in the Plaza del Mercado.
What Not To Do Around A Guy
promoting peaceful coexistence had originally drafted a longer name: municipal ordinance to promote peaceful coexistence of social behavior and the protection of public spaces . It's funny, but have left all that does not respond to its content. Thus the first block adjectives that qualify are the following:
Liar, hypocritical and false.When you see before you an ordinance entitled and think will delve into that concept as noble and republican citizenship
, training and consolidation of the same, the mechanisms for citizen participation and involvement in public affairs, and co-responsibility for services, promotion of associations ... you think you'll find a positive and exciting standard. But spend the first page and disappointments you fast, since the preamble will make clear that: "The purpose of this ordinance is to preserve the public space as a place of coexistence and citizenship [...] is the decision of the City minor and delete antisocial acts of our city and to this end is a need for a legislative text. " Who should bother looking and, if necessary, sanction him. Few would dispute (more on that later), but the fact is that this is not what the title says it is this ordinance. Reduce the life of society to a comprehensive catalog and detailed performance is prohibited too express disdain the very concept of coexistence.
Franco, paternalistic and boorish.
If giving any hint as to measure "development", we know that you have to do is do things forbidden and what is the amount of the fine that we make to "preserve public space", then regulate those activities that most field erode the status of living we want to give the public space. And there is little doubt. Two phenomena are more aggressive in this regard: commercial advertising and traffic.
bus shelters, buses themselves, newsstands, telephone booths, commercial billboards, the staves of time and temperature, the staffs of batteries and new staffs that yes, big and ugly as they alone. The agora, the forum, the area of \u200b\u200bthe city where the private leaves room for the public, lies the soul of the city itself, we have moved directly to the supermarket, and we brought it to the hall of our own portal. The street no longer seems to be a space to promote coexistence, but to promote consumerism, is like a magazine of the Media Mark, but big.
And what about the traffic. Noise, danger, smoke, stress ... The only reference to it that makes the ordinance is art.13.5: "Cyclists should take a civics as it flows through the town ..." It is recochineo!, As if the bikes were More vehicles disturb the living, as if cyclists were the only ones who must assume incivility.
The truth is that the ordinance has some real gems too numerous to detail. I would only have, 50's repertoire: Article 6c) "A person shall not perform particularly abusive, arbitrary or discriminatory or involving physical or moral coercion, psychological or otherwise" (sic). Article 6.d) "is a basic duty of peaceful coexistence treated with respect, care and special consideration to those who, by their personal, social or otherwise, have the greatest need" (Sic). You really need to tell us from a city ordinance should not be hitting people on the street and to be treated with consideration for the elderly? Because if we are, we are. And then you have to specify also from the ordinance which is the due consideration and under what circumstances, otherwise open a world of arbitrariness in the conduct of law enforcement officers.
Not to mention the requirement of express authorization for any association put an information table on the street, that smacks too much of the censorship expressly prohibited under Article 20 of our Constitution.
Although I like most is this: Section 13.2: "It shall be prohibited in public [...] of activities (that) threatens the safety of people [...]. This prohibition shall not apply in cases where permission has been obtained. " (I swear, I read it).
unnecessary, stupid and tortuous.
yes we said before, we must avoid that annoying and disturbing, if necessary, punish. Of course. Approval in plenary Councillor stressed that, in so far this year, both environmental and educators local police had opened 583 files for improper conduct of citizens. I think it's important that we stay with this data. Obviously explain that in a state of law can not punish anything that is not established. That is, if you have opened these files is, precisely and inexorably, that the legislation which allows them to be opened already exists. There
have ordinances Cleaning (2001: 107 articles), Animals (2002: 25 articles and 3 provisions), Green Spaces (2003: 13 articles, 1 and 3 annexes available), Advertising (2006: 23 items and 5 rules), Noise (2009: 52 articles 8 provisions and 2 annexes) or by the General Plan, under review. No citizen behavior seems to be lacking in regulation, anyone could think that peeing in the street, broken streetlights or annoy you with noise was not already banned? The new ordinance is in conflict with all previous absolutely, very different forms typifying the conduct and fined widely.
Fortunately, the Popular Party has noticed and made some sense in all this by adding a transitional provision which states: "shall be deemed repealed few determinations were established in other municipal ordinances that are dissatisfied with this Ordinance. In what is not contradictory, other municipal ordinances apply in a supplementary. " Okay, perfect, would have all the sense if it were not in the same text, two lines before the additional provision reads: "This Ordinance shall supplementary nature of such other municipal ordinances regulating the matter more specific. So the Ordinance says they are an extra from the others and that others are also hers. The "suppletory" from "supletorizado" is something that not even Groucho had repaired. For although the ordinance does not read the PP has bundled brown.
Ending already, we can not say that this text with claims of "civic ordinance" is not even one of those nineteenth-century ordinances "police and good government." Its etymology is the same: the civitas, city, citizenship, civilization ... of the Romans, or the polis, politics, the Greek Police (police understood the term in its most amiable of being in state police, magazine , tidy, presentable ...). Those of Logroño in 1876 and 1900 are two texts of tremendous value to dive in the history of this city and the lifestyle of its inhabitants. Adjusted from the hours of men and women bathing in the Ebro to the prohibition against law enforcement officers removed the mask to a person during Carnival.
said, I repeat, in plenary council, which had opened 583 files for uncivil behavior. Given the enormous diversity of punishable actions: starting a flower, not picking up the dog poop, to high volume of radio, throwing papers ... actually 583 cases opened this year in a city of 153,000 inhabitants is a real trifle, a trifle, something that speaks much good sense and citizens in general, and, above all, unnecessary what is this new ordinance (compare, for example, with tens of thousands of traffic fines and more than two thousand accidents).
These days we have witnessed the interesting talks on the Inquisition and the witch trial held in Logroño Zugarramurdi four hundred years ago. The members of that tribunal would be delighted to see that the inquisitorial spirit is still alive on this earth and that is not only to Vara de Rey, 3. The speakers at this conference have emphasized the moral obligation to investigate those events and have placed particular emphasis on the overwhelming conclusion, demolishing, timeless reached by Alonso de Salazar (the "lawyer of the Witches") after, the process is complete, two thousand interviews in the north of Navarre: "no witches nor bewitched until they started talking about them."
Carlos Álvarez González
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
What Is Baby Ambesol?
http://www.larioja.com/v/20101109/opinion/pleno-ordenanza-civica-20101109.html
Editor: On the civic ordinance unanimously approved by the full City Council, I would claim Concha Arribas:
Ordinance peaceful coexistence: the shadows
http://www.larioja.com/v/20101114/opinion/ordenanza-convivencia-ciudadana-sombras-20101114.html
The ordinance called for the Promotion of Peaceful Coexistence, adopted by the city of Logroño, contains a number of issues, at least, disturbing:
Friday, November 12, 2010
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Best Buy Snowmobile Helmet
Http://www.larioja.com/v/20101105/rioja-logrono/haya-orden-ciudad-20101105.html
http://integracion-rediseno.elcorreodigital.com/alava/v/20101105/rioja/ordenanza-convivencia-marcha-20101109.html
Civic Si, but against the ordinance
The Platform 'Cívicxs against the ordinance "would draw attention
local political groups for the forthcoming municipal full
day 4, which will consider Civic approval of the Ordinance.
This Thursday, be subject to approval by the municipal plenary session called 'Civic
Ordinance. " For this reason, the Platform 'Cívicxs against the Ordinance', formed as a result of
was made public the first draft, wants to express its disagreement with
rules, and appeals to the responsibility of the political representatives not to allow
approval.
The thirty or social organizations, unions and policies that make this
logroñesas Platform distrust of the current cult of civic ordinance, with more pain than glory,
(http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Prohibido/gritar/hora/siesta/elpepisoc/20101026elpepisoc_1/Tes) runs our state
(Barcelona, \u200b\u200bGranada, Seville, Lugo, Oviedo, Pamplona, \u200b\u200bBilbao ...).
for the platform, this ordinance constitutes an unnecessary hindrance
fundamental rights such as freedom of expression or the right to demonstrate and strengthen the communication problems and coexistence
to transfer police
responsibilities of each person. It's the police who will decide the character 'civic' or 'uncivil' of
many everyday situations, according to a legal framework that generates considerable legal uncertainty. This excess
policy, space and public roads are no longer places for living
, exchange, intercultural and creativity.
citizens are thus reduced to mere automatons, devoid of critical and creative capacity of
commitment to the environment or ability to resolve conflicts and communicate in a more satisfactory
and creative.
So when you need it most, the city loses potential to reinvent itself.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Trane Xe80 Diagnostic Lights
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Swollen Feet After After Giving Birth
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
Sn Manual Mount Blade
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Loose Stools Back Pain
Team Zissou Adidas Shoes
From "
Swat Analysis A&m Clinic
The Engine Room has produced a document collecting some of the conclusions emerging from the day
http://www.gigasize.com/get.php?d=wtnfgmppf3f
Thursday, June 17, 2010
What To Wear During Initiation Sorority
How has the government come from? It is intended to wash their hands accusing the problem comes from its implementation and they do the best they can, feed the speech blaming evasion, which is not the reason that we increase the value of tickets each month, reaching (for now) at 560 and 160 pesos. And all this institutional theft have gestated in the most dirty, starting with the terrorizing of people with paltry fines, placing the conflict between them "users," giving the information far above the dates of the highs, victimizing businessmen who allegedly loaded with a tremendous deficit, and support in their famous panel of experts. Before
had about eight thousand buses and an average of two owners by buses, now only five are centralizing all the money we make use of Transantiago. It seems obvious to ask how come there is a deficit if there are fewer buses (less expenses) and are five pockets that take more than 20% of the wages of working families? Unlike every time we carry the familiar beep card on Monday morning we are giving them an interest-free loan to strengthen its process of capitalist accumulation. That
Piñera and his Panel of Experts blindfolded us and put us hand in my pocket, because together they are a real expert panel but the PROFITS! What do the students? The side are already showing strength, rise up and demand the school pass free of charge. And we, students of higher education "we watched? No, to mobilize, this is a privatization process that occurs in different directions, but that affect the same families. Let us go forth to fight against those who seek to settle the privatization of education and those who monopolize a thief and unworthy transportation, a quality public education, a decent transport system for all our families and because they do not sell blunt speech.
officers have long-MINEDUC CONFECH gratuity would play in securing the NER, which pass the 365 days last year and the rate represent 25% of adult fare (not the 33% today). What happened? The passages continued to rise, the table broke after fruitless negotiations, getting only that student movements will contain the table while it lasted.
not expect the leaders to summon us, gives the real organization from below. And we defend our organization does not become mere meetings with the authorities, but real change. This hike is part of the general privatization still be sighted more increases in costs for working families. What this is a process and not merely short-term reactions. Among all built-action mobilization!
We can not be defeated, theft everywhere! A rise!