INFORMATION NOTE
Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" ALLEGED with names
Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" presented Registration Hall 325 individual claims against the "Bylaw for the Promotion of Coexistence" .
Speaking at the Full Council of 4 November Councilmember Concha Arribas justified the need for this rule showing more than 300 citizen complaints of various kinds. Thinned plot, when the Platform Cívicxs against the ordinance "has collected ten days in a 325 individual supports the arguments against this standard. self-deceit, sell this ordinance as a singular and convincing that his alleged idiosyncratic demand emanates from social logroñeses. The fallacy is revealed when checking similarities with the ordinances Barcelona, \u200b\u200bGranada, Seville, Lugo, Oviedo, Pamplona ... that seem to come as standard.
Platform "Cívicxs against the ordinance" has opted for individual presentation of claims, among other reasons, to show the absurdity of the charge of the Councillor against its members to hide behind Platforms anonymous.
support collection was launched at a ceremony which took place on November 27 in Market Square. That day was no room for denouncing injustices, exhibition of posters, role playing, bike repair shop, games, chat in the company of sweet wine ... For precisely this platform considers that this ordinance puts a halt, despite its paradoxical and interested nickname is the coexistence and social participation in a public space.
In these days when the government officially presumed guarantors of fundamental rights, in practice, wrap engender friendly legal tools that seriously violated de facto.
seempretend invisible to people deprived of these rights, people on the street, jobless, survivors begging or selling scarves, involuntary actors that portray the contradictions of capitalism. Faced with these increasingly obvious, the alternative becomes the stigmatization and criminalization of these groups. And square the circle, the ability to censor criticism and denunciation of social and political groups putting tripping and obstructing fundamental freedoms such as expression , meeting or demonstration.
The deadline for filing claims expired. For the Platform Cívicxs against Ordinance " this stage has been used to help inform and generate debate among the citizens. Opens a new phase with a number of fronts in continue walking towards a model of responsible citizenship, creative, critical and transformative.
TEXT OF CLAIMS
LOGROÑO THE CITY COUNCIL OF
D_______________________________ with ID No. _______________________________, and address for service in Logrono, ______________________________, street to the City Council to appear and make an appropriate SAYS:
That legal formula within CLAIMS Bylaw on the promotion of peaceful coexistence, whose initial approval was published in the Journal Officiel de La Rioja as of November 4, 2010 based on the following:
CLAIMS
FIRST .- Understands the respondent that this ordinance does not contribute to improve the living but also deepens the lack of communication and intolerance among the citizens, far from creating public spaces in the city as a place of coexistence and intercultural exchange, is limitation of rights and restrictions on the coexistence of citizens.
SECOND .- it believes that Reference ordinance severely limits constitutional rights, which is freedom of expression and of assembly and demonstration, which according to the provisions of our Constitution are rights that can be regulated only by the Organic Law, which of course is outside the jurisdiction of the City Council Logroño. Respondent understands that the failure to require prior authorization for information tables, putting up posters in places even if it is enabled to effect clearly limits the rights set out, represents a serious limitation of the rights included among the items being given the highest protection , warranty and coverage.
THIRD .- That the ordinance is discriminatory in terms of traffic regulation, since if it provides any inconvenience that may be caused by improper use of bicycles and not much more that can result from misuse motor vehicles.
FOURTH .- addition, the ordinance which is deficient away in terms of legal technique every time, who can not be defined without violating the principle of legal certainty which are the activities related to begging that may be disrupting the living, the mere reference to the insistence is a inadmissible vague legal concept in the field of tort law. Also attacked mercilessly in this emergency situation to the most disadvantaged social and more affected by the financial and banking crisis.
And above
REQUESTS that are addressed and appropriate to amend the ordinance in the direction indicated.
Logrono to November 23, 2010.
0 comments:
Post a Comment