Bad Times for legal rigor "Now would be a municipal police who, with his record or official report, find whether a behavior has changed the life of society "
knew that Recently, the law suffered certain disorders of behavior, which extended its tentacles cautious but relentless, shy at times, so many spiteful and biased. We knew that the charge is spread under criteria that are somewhat uncertain, and even invading grazing areas outside. We knew that the law could not stay mad at her ideal for long and we knew that the right must reinvent itself in a hypercomplex world in which it is increasingly labyrinthine apply those classical liberal principles (liberty, equality and so on), tossed in the middle of confused and entangled realities: genetics, computing, innovation, communications, technology, migration, global economies ... The world is becoming more complex, more incomprehensible, more difficult to be told. Already knew. We also knew that in this dynamic, but often guided by shadowy interests, the right would have to reproduce exponentially in response to many new situations. or maybe not. Maybe not legal because the new device is now fashionable in the city. Civility ordinance, as presented in an early television ad, to tackle once and for all those glitches hedge the rule of law so much bother. Because naive liberal legal projection was originally thought to be one of those modern metanarratives able to contain everything from certain "self-evident truths." Was evident that could not be so, so that the right should extend to areas and unexpected situations, each time adjusting to the demands of a changing reality. Until now. civic ordinances reverse this trend and are proposed as a new type of legal narrative does not fail, because not even try, to try to represent reality with pointillism and parsimony, and civic ordinance is not is report from the reality, but, above all, the pre-formed, reducing the complexity of "peaceful coexistence" with a coral tragicomedy berlanguiana beggars, bicycle, pet owners, paste-posters, street vendors and other potential infringer arbitrary configurations . All the jail!. For while the law has developed from an original constitutional provision, under judicious jurisprudential and doctrinal requirements that required adjustment with the social-and-no small opacities, now breaks civic ordinance as a method Conversely, as a way of reducing the complexity displayed in the previous law as way to return to performative statements, constituents, who, taking off from previous ideas, tell the untold metropolitan reality in just a few dozen articles. Nothing less. Legal Technology novel that, through grotesque competence ratings (must be attentive to the resources and discrediting that occurring at this legal device), more uncertainty implies that these other populist draft is intended to resolve: And is that now be a policeman who, with his record or official report, find whether a behavior has changed the life of society, has caused discomfort or have been disrespectful because people (which, incidentally, is an issue for the police). Many parliamentary debates, legislation, regulatory developments and legal disputes would have saved the world if civic ordinances had been invented two hundred years ago! Because the liberal modern law has basically consisted in searching what behaviors should be censured in a general framework of freedoms. And it is insisted the diatribes of legislators, judges, lawyers, prosecutors and academics. It was clear contexts that give meaning to the factual circumstances, to restore scope and interest, to avoid split hairs with thick strokes. It was ultimately to avoid taxes and aristocracies. But it seems that the old man has arrived right on time. Basically because this type of legal technique forwards the complexity of living together "in that sentence to be social burden on humans-a finding of immediate bureaucratic" hassle "or as" uncivil "(just as is found a traffic violation), and collect some legal literature already present in other ordinances, laws and codes, such as giving the rules package. And in a world of appearances, packing orders. And if the city promises a clean, quiet and idyllic-as an ad- mortgage is right and what it takes. Bad Times for legal rigor. Good for those who no longer need. http://www.larioja.com/v/20101126/opinion/malos-tiempos-para-rigor-20101126.html
knew that Recently, the law suffered certain disorders of behavior, which extended its tentacles cautious but relentless, shy at times, so many spiteful and biased. We knew that the charge is spread under criteria that are somewhat uncertain, and even invading grazing areas outside. We knew that the law could not stay mad at her ideal for long and we knew that the right must reinvent itself in a hypercomplex world in which it is increasingly labyrinthine apply those classical liberal principles (liberty, equality and so on), tossed in the middle of confused and entangled realities: genetics, computing, innovation, communications, technology, migration, global economies ... The world is becoming more complex, more incomprehensible, more difficult to be told. Already knew. We also knew that in this dynamic, but often guided by shadowy interests, the right would have to reproduce exponentially in response to many new situations. or maybe not.
Maybe not legal because the new device is now fashionable in the city. Civility ordinance, as presented in an early television ad, to tackle once and for all those glitches hedge the rule of law so much bother.
Because
naive liberal legal projection was originally thought to be one of those modern metanarratives able to contain everything from certain "self-evident truths." Was evident that could not be so, so that the right should extend to areas and unexpected situations, each time adjusting to the demands of a changing reality. Until now.
civic ordinances reverse this trend and are proposed as a new type of legal narrative does not fail, because not even try, to try to represent reality with pointillism and parsimony, and civic ordinance is not is report from the reality, but, above all, the pre-formed, reducing the complexity of "peaceful coexistence" with a coral tragicomedy berlanguiana beggars, bicycle, pet owners, paste-posters, street vendors and other potential infringer arbitrary configurations . All the jail!.
For while the law has developed from an original constitutional provision, under judicious jurisprudential and doctrinal requirements that required adjustment with the social-and-no small opacities, now breaks civic ordinance as a method Conversely, as a way of reducing the complexity displayed in the previous law as way to return to performative statements, constituents, who, taking off from previous ideas, tell the untold metropolitan reality in just a few dozen articles. Nothing less. Legal Technology novel that, through grotesque competence ratings (must be attentive to the resources and discrediting that occurring at this legal device), more uncertainty implies that these other populist draft is intended to resolve:
And is that now be a policeman who, with his record or official report, find whether a behavior has changed the life of society, has caused discomfort or have been disrespectful because people (which, incidentally, is an issue for the police). Many parliamentary debates, legislation, regulatory developments and legal disputes would have saved the world if civic ordinances had been invented two hundred years ago! Because the liberal modern law has basically consisted in searching what behaviors should be censured in a general framework of freedoms. And it is insisted the diatribes of legislators, judges, lawyers, prosecutors and academics. It was clear contexts that give meaning to the factual circumstances, to restore scope and interest, to avoid split hairs with thick strokes. It was ultimately to avoid taxes and aristocracies.
But it seems that the old man has arrived right on time. Basically because this type of legal technique forwards the complexity of living together "in that sentence to be social burden on humans-a finding of immediate bureaucratic" hassle "or as" uncivil "(just as is found a traffic violation), and collect some legal literature already present in other ordinances, laws and codes, such as giving the rules package. And in a world of appearances, packing orders. And if the city promises a clean, quiet and idyllic-as an ad- mortgage is right and what it takes.
Bad Times for legal rigor. Good for those who no longer need.
0 comments:
Post a Comment