Personalized Koozies Sayings

Ordinance Ordinances "civic" in the service of the harassment and arbitrary action against immigrants submitting comments

http://www.europapress.es/catalunya/noticia-lhospitalet-badalona-pediran-denegar-arraigo-inmigrantes-incivicos- government-20101221041330.html

Eagle Metal Core Wholesale

ANTONIO IN ............... MEETINGS WITH EYE

Pokemon Soul Silver Freezing Patch Usa

Beware of meetings, if you see the carabiner is worn the rope passes through the ring of the meeting.

Year End Church Donation Letter Samples

Ordinance Ordinance civic

Links to press:

http://www.elcorreo.com/vizcaya/v/20101211/rioja/alegaciones-contra-ordenanza-civica-20101211.html

http://www.abc.es/agencias/noticia.asp?noticia=621844

http://www.larioja.com/v/20101213/rioja-logrono/presentadas-alegaciones-contra -project-20101213.html

INFORMATION NOTE

Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" ALLEGED with names

Platform "Cívicxs against Ordinance" presented Registration Hall 325 individual claims against the "Bylaw for the Promotion of Coexistence" .

Speaking at the Full Council of 4 November Councilmember Concha Arribas justified the need for this rule showing more than 300 citizen complaints of various kinds. Thinned plot, when the Platform Cívicxs against the ordinance "has collected ten days in a 325 individual supports the arguments against this standard. self-deceit, sell this ordinance as a singular and convincing that his alleged idiosyncratic demand emanates from social logroñeses. The fallacy is revealed when checking similarities with the ordinances Barcelona, \u200b\u200bGranada, Seville, Lugo, Oviedo, Pamplona ... that seem to come as standard.

Platform "Cívicxs against the ordinance" has opted for individual presentation of claims, among other reasons, to show the absurdity of the charge of the Councillor against its members to hide behind Platforms anonymous.

support collection was launched at a ceremony which took place on November 27 in Market Square. That day was no room for denouncing injustices, exhibition of posters, role playing, bike repair shop, games, chat in the company of sweet wine ... For precisely this platform considers that this ordinance puts a halt, despite its paradoxical and interested nickname is the coexistence and social participation in a public space.

In these days when the government officially presumed guarantors of fundamental rights, in practice, wrap engender friendly legal tools that seriously violated de facto.

seem

pretend invisible to people deprived of these rights, people on the street, jobless, survivors begging or selling scarves, involuntary actors that portray the contradictions of capitalism. Faced with these increasingly obvious, the alternative becomes the stigmatization and criminalization of these groups. And square the circle, the ability to censor criticism and denunciation of social and political groups putting tripping and obstructing fundamental freedoms such as expression , meeting or demonstration.

The deadline for filing claims expired. For the Platform Cívicxs against Ordinance " this stage has been used to help inform and generate debate among the citizens. Opens a new phase with a number of fronts in continue walking towards a model of responsible citizenship, creative, critical and transformative.

TEXT OF CLAIMS

LOGROÑO THE CITY COUNCIL OF

D_______________________________ with ID No. _______________________________, and address for service in Logrono, ______________________________, street to the City Council to appear and make an appropriate SAYS:

That legal formula within CLAIMS Bylaw on the promotion of peaceful coexistence, whose initial approval was published in the Journal Officiel de La Rioja as of November 4, 2010 based on the following:

CLAIMS

FIRST .- Understands the respondent that this ordinance does not contribute to improve the living but also deepens the lack of communication and intolerance among the citizens, far from creating public spaces in the city as a place of coexistence and intercultural exchange, is limitation of rights and restrictions on the coexistence of citizens.

SECOND .- it believes that Reference ordinance severely limits constitutional rights, which is freedom of expression and of assembly and demonstration, which according to the provisions of our Constitution are rights that can be regulated only by the Organic Law, which of course is outside the jurisdiction of the City Council Logroño. Respondent understands that the failure to require prior authorization for information tables, putting up posters in places even if it is enabled to effect clearly limits the rights set out, represents a serious limitation of the rights included among the items being given the highest protection , warranty and coverage.

THIRD .- That the ordinance is discriminatory in terms of traffic regulation, since if it provides any inconvenience that may be caused by improper use of bicycles and not much more that can result from misuse motor vehicles.

FOURTH .- addition, the ordinance which is deficient away in terms of legal technique every time, who can not be defined without violating the principle of legal certainty which are the activities related to begging that may be disrupting the living, the mere reference to the insistence is a inadmissible vague legal concept in the field of tort law. Also attacked mercilessly in this emergency situation to the most disadvantaged social and more affected by the financial and banking crisis.

And above

REQUESTS that are addressed and appropriate to amend the ordinance in the direction indicated.

Logrono to November 23, 2010.

Dvp Sr200p Region Free Cod4e

KLIC HERE. http://celiavern.blogspot.com

Movies El Cajon Westfield Mall

: Same for all?

Walking through the streets of Logroño is impossible not to wonder whether, as provided in Article 12.2 of the 'municipal ordinance to promote peaceful coexistence of social behavior and the protection of public spaces', they have express permission to display signs in bus shelters, tables, lighting and traffic lights, facades of public buildings and private ... organized events for these days in our city and collaboration have expressed (and is reflected in the posters themselves) of local, regional or state. Posters on the XII Congress of the Volunteer State, acts related to the International Day Against Violence Gender ...

And it is impossible not to worry with the most predictable hypothesis that, from now on, you can establish a double standard in allowing or failing to report certain events depending on who convene or support.

Or is to be penalized by fines up to $ 750 to anyone who dares to put a poster signed by a ministry, counseling, or council in a marquee? Or is that the appropriate municipal authorities will show the same diligence to allow or give the nod on the advertising of an act which has the express support of that authority, with another that does not count? Will they be able be prohibited in the right hand what they approve to the left? Automultarán Are they, or will do penance and self-summoned to do 'tasks or duties to the community "(Art.34.1)? This should not be missed.

may be interesting to come up with a digital camera and take on record the violation of this Ordinance by institutions in the hands of the same political parties that have adopted, brought into the process for judicial waters to denounce those who, so jealous, try to eliminate activities allegedly uncivil, but that just lead by example, perhaps because they have the impunity that is given a monopoly to decide and punish who is "uncivil" and who is not.

In short, can be revealing to comply with exquisite thoroughness which marks the Article 6.7 of the Ordinance and "cooperate ... in behaviors that alter, disturb or affect the life of society ', as indeed is the "antisocial" activity of placing a sign on a lamp when you get the signature or cooperation, for example, the City of Logroño.

Finally, suggest to Councilor Arribas and experienced team that drafted the ordinance to correct the spelling at least, for "prohibited" accents on the 'i'. They do not blind your desire to prohibit (Arts. 8.2, 8.4, 10.3 ...) what should be the obligatory need to maintain civic behavior with our spelling.

http://www.larioja.com/v/20101207/opinion/ordenanza-civica-igual-para-20101207.html

Grand Touring Vs Ultra High All Season

CLIMBING ACCIDENT IN THE WATER BIRDS

Birds in a puddle of the road.

Use Of Preparation H On Dogs

OBLIVION AND SECRET MADROÑO

El Madroño.

Oblivion.

How Long Do You Take Leviquin

Ordinance (In) Civic

Ordinance (In) Civic

Thursday 12/02/2010 - 18:24 - Julio Romero Martinez

biokaiku@yahoo.es Logroño: Ordinance "Civic."

It is at least curious that virtually rules modeled on those originating in the heat of large speculative events (Barcelona Forum of Cultures 2004), enacted in Logroño and other cities from a pattern of FEMP, and approved with great social protest by some of the more conservative municipalities of Spain comes to our city from the hand of socialist municipal equipment, specifically the head of the Department of Environment and Equality, Concha Arribas, and is held by two other political parties with representation in the consistory, Riojano Party and Popular Party.

Immersed in the global climate cuts of rights and freedoms under the pretext of security and order, covered in a purported class citizens, calling themselves "ordinance to promote coexistence" dangerously equates the punishment of hooliganism with restrictions on speech in public space Various social groups and movements, minority power uncomfortable or unhappy with the official morality. Beyond

a statement of intent, which cause such ordinances is the submission of individual social responsibility and its delegation in a Big Brother police discretion which we are forced to rely on. Rather than creating cohabitation, imposing sanctioned to, what they get is loaded. How?
Opening door to the criminalization of unruly groups for the official single thought, restriction of innovative or creative uses (urban cyclists, skaters, street art, street games, free speech), criminalizing poverty and marginalization, each more present and cumbersome in view of society that causes biempensante (begging, street work ...) and jeopardizing the spontaneity and communication to society of social movements themselves, especially those less amenable to power, it all depends on the required authorization (Or alternatively, penalty) Municipal its presence in the street.

By equating education with sanction threat, rehabilitation works for the benefit of it is unclear what private or public bodies which are sure to replace jobs, legal uncertainty and arbitrariness in its application to police the ordinance which brought about this cause more problems than he claims to want to solve.

Beyond the strictly legal, which would be the subject of another debate (not without controversy, as is being demonstrated from within the University of La Rioja) test this ordinance to existing regulations sobrenormativizar orientation populist, it is conceivable that the search of the vote of fear in a close election outcome uncertain. As is well explained by the very text of the ordinance:
"(...) This ordinance is not intended to be the solution to such behavior, but response to public concern at this phenomenon."

Citing the protection of public goods, there is however way for the degradation of public space through the truly antisocial mechanisms neoliberal privatization and speculation, while the contrary is increasingly difficult ownership of real public space (all to all) by citizenship.

A valuable public space that goes far beyond the beautification of urban furniture, modesty, decorum, normal, common sense or decency, as they appear monopolized, innuendo and vague in this Ordinance does not seek securitization but impose a conservative moral of official power, with a clear vocation for social control. Create

living it, generates good public space security. On the contrary, security enforced does not necessarily good public space. This is the familiar image of a strong hand to appease the fear in times of crisis. Scourge of "vagrancy", to which this ordinance reminds suspiciously taking us back to times we thought we overcome long ago. History repeats itself and shows us again and again how in times of systemic crisis appear populist authoritarian practices of this Ordinance is only a sample.

http://servicios.larioja.com/tu-noticia/tu_noticia_ver/Ordenanza-% 28in% 29Civica/41364/1.htm