As most should know our faculty is working on a project MECESUP own topic focused mainly on curriculum innovation, namely the installation of a reform of the Pre-degree change, our mesh, and their career profiles. But that is far in its original idea of \u200b\u200bwhat we might aspire as public university. MECESUP is constantly evaluated to see their progress in our faculty the process is well behind and it seems that the matter has not made much progress. On the one hand there is no consensus to implement the "recipes" that we intend to install this project, nor has there been a collective discussion (among the various segments) on the future of our faculty. It is in this context that on Monday September 7 will be evaluated from the ministry to praise progress of the project, this is the "Mid Term Review" and visit the power barons of the project and the ministry.
Strangely
community has not been told anything and apparently would have to show progress of various processes that have been brewing in college. We must remember that Decanatura pompously announced a few months ago MECESUP advances, the advent of computers and other supplies, but did not say anything about our disciplines. What worked Monday 7? What progress displayed Friend, director of MECESUP and undergraduate school of our faculty?
Students, faculty and staff have not yet fully discussed the projects that we want for our disciplines, there are races that have not advanced our faculty also has opened a debate on this. We therefore need to not only let's stop right ears on what's happening today, but also take a more active role. MECESUP aims to reform our faculty, but they already have a plan worked out of our university, we can not stand idly by, we must take a stand and put on the table.
We must demand that our faculty no longer has this role as passive, which seems content to show the black dye with a clear management; do not want an undergraduate reform a pint of entrepreneurs (the funding is for obvious competitive external mandates has to be applied in our ability and try to implement a competency model that attempts adjust to the best of our disciplines to the market.), but the service of Chile and the people. Why not consult other stakeholders on what should be a university and a public school? Do the same students, workers, neighbors, or indigenous peoples have nothing to say? Comrades
s must take the bull by the horns: The address should be reported immediately MECESUP what to say at this meeting next Monday, what progress and what will the whole process should not be hide information! We must also put a spin on these discussions, take the lead in discussion and action from our own space and begin to propose different ways for a faculty, but not like those above, but we build the various university bodies with a clear conviction of transforming this country and this society.
