AWARE AND EDUCATION FROM BELOW Transform
On Wednesday and Thursday not to go home
As you may have read by mail , or perhaps a pamphlet or poster, Wednesday and Thursday will relieve us of activities curriculum from 12:00 to 18:00 hrs., giving us an important opportunity to organize and discuss based on the themes that touch us today as students. Already opened the discussion regarding access, is the opportunity to deepen and advance a clear and firm position as students.
We propose the context of the "National Education Congress, good body in theory but in practice is done by the usual suspects and their measurement. The political leaders know that the party FECH already arranged before play and legitimize a democratic makeup looks easy. Not enact or with bureaucracies, or patches that try to impose by above political agendas far removed from the profound changes that need our faculty and our education. But they profess, and with enough conviction, the need to reconstitute as actors, so that it can mobilize to sign the cards on the table: We want better education, and this is built from now, of all and the day day. Beyond
artificial bodies, supported by the same political machinery, it is necessary that we go build on our strength as students, and the discussion is the first step to doing. We must take advantage and give our own content these days (despite their limitations), to discuss and openly raise and addresses our opinion.
We want to build real processes. That is why from Platform Collective call on colleagues to attend faculty meetings and race to be held on Thursday after 12 hrs. to initiate a deeper discussion on access and reform of undergraduate, cross-cutting themes careers of our faculty and university, on which students must position ourselves politically.
How should our disciplines, which are not only instruments of contemplation, but to take action, engage with our country and its necessary changes? How we prevent our nets from deepening market criteria, apply these to public education? How do we achieve equal access beyond what has been proposed as solutions? Are there enough places in the race to solve the issue of access? How does it affect our training and development of our disciplines in general the social composition of students? Is it a desirable goal increased PSU scores of students entering careers in the power, as sostienten our authorities?
On Wednesday and Thursday not to go home
As you may have read by mail , or perhaps a pamphlet or poster, Wednesday and Thursday will relieve us of activities curriculum from 12:00 to 18:00 hrs., giving us an important opportunity to organize and discuss based on the themes that touch us today as students. Already opened the discussion regarding access, is the opportunity to deepen and advance a clear and firm position as students.
We propose the context of the "National Education Congress, good body in theory but in practice is done by the usual suspects and their measurement. The political leaders know that the party FECH already arranged before play and legitimize a democratic makeup looks easy. Not enact or with bureaucracies, or patches that try to impose by above political agendas far removed from the profound changes that need our faculty and our education. But they profess, and with enough conviction, the need to reconstitute as actors, so that it can mobilize to sign the cards on the table: We want better education, and this is built from now, of all and the day day. Beyond
artificial bodies, supported by the same political machinery, it is necessary that we go build on our strength as students, and the discussion is the first step to doing. We must take advantage and give our own content these days (despite their limitations), to discuss and openly raise and addresses our opinion.
We want to build real processes. That is why from Platform Collective call on colleagues to attend faculty meetings and race to be held on Thursday after 12 hrs. to initiate a deeper discussion on access and reform of undergraduate, cross-cutting themes careers of our faculty and university, on which students must position ourselves politically.
How should our disciplines, which are not only instruments of contemplation, but to take action, engage with our country and its necessary changes? How we prevent our nets from deepening market criteria, apply these to public education? How do we achieve equal access beyond what has been proposed as solutions? Are there enough places in the race to solve the issue of access? How does it affect our training and development of our disciplines in general the social composition of students? Is it a desirable goal increased PSU scores of students entering careers in the power, as sostienten our authorities?